About Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Ethics Watch uses high impact legal actions to hold public officials and organizations accountable for unethical activities that undermine the integrity of state and local government.
Sign up for Email Alerts



image Ethics Watch Tipline
image
image
"It makes one wonder why a public official made certain decisions, especially ones that benefited certain interests, when just days, months or years later they take a lucrative job lobbying for the same interests."
Craig Holman, a government affairs expert at Public Citizen, commenting on Scott McInnis' voting record, as quoted in The Denver Post, 07/25/2010.

Coffman Decision: IEC Falls Short Of Mandate, Excuses Textbook Conflicts

April 14, 2009

Today, the Independent Ethics Commission (IEC) issued its ruling in the complaint brought by Colorado Ethics Watch alleging ethics violations by Congressman Mike Coffman while he served as Colorado’s Secretary of State.  The IEC found that Coffman technically violated state law by allowing a senior employee to operate a partisan side business, but excused his conflict with a voting machine vendor based on apparent procedural safeguards.  As a result, the IEC ruled not to impose sanctions.  Chantell Taylor, director of Ethics Watch, released this statement in response:

 

“By its ruling today the IEC set the bar dangerously low for ethics in the state and Colorado voters should be gravely concerned about the precedent set by this decision.  Mr. Coffman unapologetically admitted in his testimony at the hearing that he knowingly hired the same firm to launch his congressional campaign that was simultaneously lobbying on behalf of a voting system vendor during the system certification process.  Ethics Watch also established through documentary evidence and testimony that Mr. Coffman was fully aware that his elections technology director was running an unlawful side business and did nothing to stop it.  The IEC ignored this evidence, including a statement from Mr. Kopelman himself that proved Mr. Coffman’s knowledge.  The IEC did not see fit to reprimand Mr. Coffman for these textbook examples of a conflict of interest, sending an alarming message to all Colorado public officials that ethics standards in this state are still toothless.

 

Also concerning is the IEC’s disregard of the constitutional requirement that it conduct an investigation of all complaints.  In this case, the IEC conducted no investigation, did not allow Ethics Watch to engage in any discovery, and then claimed a lack of evidence as the basis for its ruling.  Let this be clear to Colorado voters: the IEC does not intend to fulfill its duty to serve as Colorado’s ethics enforcement commission. 

 

On the positive side, thanks to Ethics Watch’s complaint, Mr. Coffman was finally forced to answer for his actions in front of the voter-established commission.  We hope this puts all public officials in this state on notice that unethical behavior will still be identified, examined in front of the voters, and reviewed for possible sanctions.  Ethics Watch will continue to pressure the IEC to do its job and hold public officials accountable for their standards of conduct through legal actions and by empowering Colorado citizens with vital information about the activities of their state and local government.”



image


Colorado Ethics Watch is a project of
image
© 2010, Ethics Watch, All Rights Reserved.
1630 Welton Street, Suite 415, Denver, CO 80202 • Contact Us
image

image