About Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Ethics Watch uses high impact legal actions to hold public officials and organizations accountable for unethical activities that undermine the integrity of state and local government.
Sign up for Email Alerts



image Ethics Watch Tipline
image
image
"If there is a policy, there might need to be a better balance between protecting sensitive records and not inhibiting the rights of whislteblowers."
Gov. Bill Ritter commenting on the review of a new policy that forbids state employees from secretly tape-recording their co-workers in the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, as quoted on 9News.com, 01/06/2008.

Ethics panel says some perks allowed by Amendment 41

By Tillie Fong, The Rocky Mountain News,
October 8, 2008

Colorado's Independent Ethics Commission has determined that scholarships, insurance policies and dinners with friends are allowed under Amendment 41.

The measure, approved by voters in 2006, established a gift ban for elected officials and government workers and their families.

Gifts from lobbyists are prohibited, and anything worth more than $50 in value is not allowed from non-lobbyists.

"We think the majority did the right thing and applied a common-sense interpretation that reinforces the ethics law that was passed by voters two years ago," said Jenny Flanagan, executive director for Colorado Common Cause, which backed Amendment 41.

"The ethics commission affirmed and reinforced on how these laws should be applied."

However, the commission was split 3-2 on the decision about scholarships.

Dissenters Matt Smith and Sally Hopper argued that the language in the Blue Book, the state's bipartisan guide for voters, did not exempt scholarships from the gift ban.

Opponents of Amendment 41 said that split decision opens the door to future challenges.

"In light of the fact that it was not an unanimous decision, it raises a lot of questions of judicial interpretation," said Douglas Friednash, an attorney with Greenberg Traurig, which represents a group challenging the constitutionality of Amendment 41. "You can use the dissent to challenge the decision."

Friednash also said the commission also sent a clear message on its first position statement about the gift ban.

"They want to send a signal that they intend to interpret Amendment 41 very broadly, possibly very different from what was presented to the voters," he said.

"It sends a signal that they may very well whittle away Amendment 41 until it becomes no more than an anti-bribery statute, which we already have in Colorado law."

But opponents of Amendment 41 have challenged the constitutionality of the law and raised questions on whether scholarships, honoraria, prizes and even dinner with friends were prohibited by the ban.

In February, the Colorado Supreme Court decided not to hear the challenge on the constitutionality of Amendment 41 until the law has been applied or enforced.

In April, Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff asked statehouse leaders to submit a series of questions to the Independent Ethics Commission to review.

The questions included whether employees are prohibited from accepting college scholarships and whether college professors must forgo prizes for their work.

The Independent Ethics Commission, which was seated in March, didn't start taking up questions until last month.

For the full story, please visit http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/oct/08/ethics-panel-says-some-pe...

image


© 2009, Ethics Watch, All Rights Reserved.
1630 Welton Street, Suite 415, Denver, CO 80202 • Contact Us
a project of
image
image

image