<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.coloradoforethics.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Related Ethics Headlines</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/news/mediacoverage/headlines</link>
 <description>Media Coverage/Press Clips page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>  Consumers win big on payday lending battle</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28277</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Consumers and consumer advocates for payday reform won a major battle
Tuesday when the Attorney General’s office adopted rules that allow a 
refund of all fees on payday loans when there is early repayment of the 
loan.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The new rules, which grew out of legislation passed in May, were 
adopted unanimously by the AG’s administrator for the Uniform Consumer 
Credit Code and a subcommittee of the Council of Advisors on Consumer 
Credit.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  3 Sep 2010 13:59:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28277 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>City won&#039;t pursue charges stemming from failed Poppaw recall effort</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28276</link>
 <description>There&#039;s no probable cause that organizers of a failed effort to 
recall Fort Collins City Council member Lisa Poppaw violated municipal 
campaign laws, a special prosecutor said this week.
&lt;div class=&quot;articleflex-container&quot;&gt;
		
&lt;div class=&quot;articleflex&quot;&gt;
			&lt;br /&gt;
			
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Colorado Ethics Watch, a
Denver-based watchdog group,  filed a complaint in June that said the 
recall organizers, Stacy Lynne and Rudy Zitti, may have failed to 
properly register as an issue committee before raising and spending 
money.
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  3 Sep 2010 13:27:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28276 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Grice withdraws campaign finance complaint against Buck</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28275</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Charles “Rick” Grice, the man who translated long rumors into print 
by &lt;a href=&quot;http://coloradoindependent.com/54809/norton-calls-buck-corrupt-buck-calls-norton-desperate&quot;&gt;filing
a campaign finance complaint with the Federal Elections Commission&lt;/a&gt; 
against U.S. Senate candidate Ken Buck, withdrew that complaint Monday. 
He sent a letter to the FEC and a copy of that letter to the Buck 
campaign saying he no longer wished to pursue the matter.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28275&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  3 Sep 2010 13:25:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28275 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DPS board slips, posts agenda after meeting happens</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28274</link>
 <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;overflow: hidden; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none&quot;&gt;
Denver&#039;s
school board held an all-day training retreat last month but failed to 
follow the Colorado Open Records law that requires public bodies to post
agendas before meetings.&lt;span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a style=&quot;color: #003399&quot; href=&quot;http://www.denverpost.com/education/ci_15978289#ixzz0yUFioNPL&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  3 Sep 2010 13:03:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ltoro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28274 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ritter staff&#039;s job searches raise issue that riles critic of ethics law</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28271</link>
 <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;overflow: hidden; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A state ethics commission has informed lame- 
duck Gov. Bill Ritter and his staff that prospective employers can pick 
up their travel expenses during job searches but to exercise caution.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Independent Ethics Commission suggested the governor and his 
staffers seek permission on a case-by-case basis in those situations 
where there is a concern the expenses would violate an ethics ban voters
approved in 2006.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28271&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  2 Sep 2010 15:11:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28271 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Colorado says Arapahoe County not following law on mail-in ballots</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28270</link>
 <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;overflow: hidden; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Colorado attorney general on Wednesday 
sought an injunction to force officials in Arapahoe County to follow a 
new law requiring mail-in ballots to be accepted at every polling 
location.
&lt;/p&gt;
 
&lt;p&gt;
The injunction was filed in Arapahoe County District Court on behalf 
of the Colorado secretary of state.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28270&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  2 Sep 2010 15:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28270 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ritter staff&#039;s job searches raise issue that riles critic of ethics law</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28269</link>
 <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;overflow: hidden; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A
state ethics commission has informed lame- duck Gov. Bill Ritter and 
his staff that prospective employers can pick up their travel expenses 
during job searches but to exercise caution.
&lt;/p&gt;
 
&lt;p&gt;
The Independent Ethics Commission suggested the governor and his 
staffers seek permission on a case-by-case basis in those situations 
where there is a concern the expenses would violate an ethics ban voters
approved in 2006.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28269&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  2 Sep 2010 11:50:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ltoro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28269 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Complaint filed against Alderden</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28268</link>
 <description>The chairman of the Larimer County Democratic Party has filed a 
formal complaint with state elections officials alleging that Larimer 
County Sheriff Jim Alderden has misused taxpayer resources to campaign 
on behalf of the man he wants to replace him.
&lt;div class=&quot;articleflex-container&quot;&gt;
		
&lt;div class=&quot;articleflex&quot;&gt;
			&lt;br /&gt;
			
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Alderden strongly 
rejected the complaint, saying he has &amp;quot;scrupulously&amp;quot; avoided blurring 
the lines.
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  2 Sep 2010 11:02:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28268 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>AG’s Udis sides with consumers in payday rulemaking</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28267</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
DENVER — After four hours of testimony and deliberation in the old 
Supreme Court chambers of the state Capitol, First Assistant Attorney 
General Laura Udis decided to reverse her &lt;a href=&quot;http://coloradoindependent.com/60805/suthers-campaign-cash-hangs-over-payday-loan-hearing&quot;&gt;proposed
payday lending rules&lt;/a&gt; and effectively reinsert consumer protections 
which she said are more in line with the spirit of the law passed last 
legislative session.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28267&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  1 Sep 2010 12:53:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28267 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Suthers campaign cash hangs over payday loan hearing</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28265</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Attorney General John Suthers is not writing the new rules that will govern 
the payday loan industry in Colorado. That’s why he is playing down the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gjsentinel.com/news/articles/proposed_payday_loan_rule_absu&quot;&gt;$10,000 
in campaign donations&lt;/a&gt; he has received from the industry and saying the cash 
won’t influence the final contours of the new state regulations. The person 
writing the rules, Laura Udis, has worked in the attorney general’s department 
of consumer protection for more than two decades. She told the Colorado 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28265&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:25:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28265 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Payday lending rules cause heat for Attorney General</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28263</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Next Tuesday, Aug. 31, new proposed rules governing payday lenders in
Colorado will be reviewed by the Attorney General’s division of Uniform
Consumer Credit Code (UCCC). The current proposed rules, released July 
30, have already garnered pages of written comments, both from those who
supported House Bill 10-1351, the bill that changed payday lending law;
from the chief legal counsel for Gov. Bill Ritter; and from payday 
lending companies and the Colorado trade association that represents 
them. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28263&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:39:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28263 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No pressure</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28261</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
An attempt by lawmakers to ease the grip of payday lending on
Colorado families has turned into a swirl of controversy in the
attorney general&#039;s race.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Boulder District Attorney &lt;strong&gt;Stan Garnett&lt;/strong&gt;, a Democrat trying to unseat Republican incumbent &lt;strong&gt;John Suthers&lt;/strong&gt;,
has raised questions about $10,350 in contributions from 12 payday
lenders to Suthers&#039; campaign — which came precisely at the time
Suthers&#039; office was writing rules to implement the state&#039;s new, more
restrictive payday lending law.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:01:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28261 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Proposed payday loan rule ‘absurd,’ says Ritter’s attorney</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28262</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Proposed new rules for payday lending companies are being attacked by
the industry as well as people who want to see stricter regulations.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Gov. Bill Ritter’s chief legal counsel, Craig Welling, called one of 
the rules “absurd,” but payday lending companies say other parts go 
beyond a new law calling for them in the first place.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:45:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28262 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pinnacol Assurance Fined $80K For State Violations</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28260</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong class=&quot;Dateline&quot;&gt;DENVER -- &lt;/strong&gt;Pinnacol Assurance must pay a civil
penalty of $80,000 and credit certain policyholders a minimum of $15
million after the state Division of Insurance found the company was
essentially gouging some customers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The penalty and credit are
part of a settlement between Pinnacol and the Division of Insurance.
The settlement comes on the heels of a state-ordered audit completed
earlier this year.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:31:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28260 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Colorado ethics panel clarifies gift ban for organizations that lawmakers support</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28259</link>
 <description>&lt;span&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A  newly released opinion from the 
Colorado Independent Ethics Commission &amp;quot;effectively dismantles&amp;quot; the 
Amendment 41 gift ban for public officials that voters approved in 2006,
says a Denver attorney who has been a chief critic of the law.
&lt;/p&gt;
 
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;I think this is the most dramatic and far-reaching opinion ever 
issued by the ethics commission,&amp;quot; said attorney Doug Friednash, a former
Democratic state lawmaker who represented opponents of the gift ban in 
an unsuccessful legal challenge to overturn it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:18:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28259 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Aurora City Council&#039;s closed-door interviews raise own questions</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28258</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
AURORA — The Aurora City Council today will interview five city-manager 
candidates behind closed doors, a move that some say violates state law and 
lacks transparency.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Chris Beall, legal counsel for the Colorado Press Association, said the 
state&#039;s open-meetings law allows councils to meet in executive session to 
discuss such &amp;quot;sensitive matters&amp;quot; as personnel issues.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:50:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28258 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pinnacol Must Turn Over Pebble Beach Expense Records</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28257</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong class=&quot;Dateline&quot;&gt;DENVER -- &lt;/strong&gt;A Denver judge ruled that Pinnacol Assurance 
must turn over records of a controversial trip to Pebble Beach that 7NEWS 
requested under state open records laws.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Denver District Judge Morris Hoffman ruled that Pinnacol is a public 
agency and that there was no reason to withhold the records.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:16:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28257 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Committee: Longmont Watch gifts OK</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28255</link>
 <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px&quot; class=&quot;bodytext&quot;&gt;A political 
group known as Longmont Watch did not break the city’s election law when
it donated to City Council candidates after the group broke up, the 
city’s Election Committee ruled Monday.
&lt;p&gt;
The committee “declined to adopt a preliminary finding” on any
of four complaints by political activist Kaye Fissinger, who had 
charged Longmont Watch and council members Alex Sammoury, Gabe Santos 
and Katie Witt with violating the Longmont Fair Campaign Practices Act. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28255&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:58:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ltoro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28255 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Probe reveals cozy relationship of oil, gas industry with regulators</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28254</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, the 
federal agency that oversees the country’s 2.3 million miles of oil and 
natural gas pipelines, has adopted as part of its regulations all or 
parts of at least 29 standards written by the oil and natural gas 
industry.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28254&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:51:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dstaggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28254 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Colorado secretary of state office spends $357,487 on lawsuits</title>
 <link>http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/28249</link>
 <description>&lt;span&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A glut of lawsuits challenging Colorado 
election rules has forced the secretary of state&#039;s office to spend more 
than ever before to defend itself.
&lt;/p&gt;
 
&lt;p&gt;
The half-dozen lawsuits — a hodgepodge of challenges to restrictions 
on fundraising, petitioning and a voter-registration fight leftover from
the 2008 election — left the office with a $357,487 legal tab for the 
fiscal year ending June 30.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:02:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ltoro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28249 at http://www.coloradoforethics.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
